SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 649

J. SREENIVAS RAO, ALOK ARADHE
V. Subhramanyam – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K. Jagadishwar Reddy

JUDGMENT :

J. SREENIVAS RAO, J.

1. These two intra court appeals are filed against the common order dated 06.01.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. Nos. 14695 of 2015 and 20454 of 2016.

2. Heard Sri N. Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant, and Sri Pottigari Sreedhar Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader representing learned Advocate General Office appearing on behalf of the respondents.

3. Since the issue involved in the two writ appeals is one and the same, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. For the facility of reference, W.A. No. 141 of 2017 is being referred.

Brief facts of the case:

4. The case of the appellant is that the Government of the composite State of Andhra Pradesh in exercise of its powers under Sections 3 and 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Bhoodan and Gramdan Act, 1965 (‘Act’ for brevity) had issued G.O.Ms. No. 687 dated 14.12.2012, reconstituting the Andhra Pradesh Bhoodan Yagna Board (‘Board’ for brevity) and appointing the appellant in W.A. No. 141 of 2017 as Chairman and appellant in W.A. No. 140 of 2017 as Member of the Board along with other persons as members for a period of four years. After bifurcation of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top