J. SREENIVAS RAO, ALOK ARADHE
V. Subhramanyam – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J. SREENIVAS RAO, J.
1. These two intra court appeals are filed against the common order dated 06.01.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. Nos. 14695 of 2015 and 20454 of 2016.
2. Heard Sri N. Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant, and Sri Pottigari Sreedhar Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader representing learned Advocate General Office appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3. Since the issue involved in the two writ appeals is one and the same, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. For the facility of reference, W.A. No. 141 of 2017 is being referred.
Brief facts of the case:
4. The case of the appellant is that the Government of the composite State of Andhra Pradesh in exercise of its powers under Sections 3 and 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Bhoodan and Gramdan Act, 1965 (‘Act’ for brevity) had issued G.O.Ms. No. 687 dated 14.12.2012, reconstituting the Andhra Pradesh Bhoodan Yagna Board (‘Board’ for brevity) and appointing the appellant in W.A. No. 141 of 2017 as Chairman and appellant in W.A. No. 140 of 2017 as Member of the Board along with other persons as members for a period of four years. After bifurcation of
A.P. State Minorities Commission vs. Union of India and Others
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore vs. Brindavan Beverages (P) Ltd. and Others
Manoj Kumar vs. Union of India and Others
Mohinder Singh Gill and Another vs. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and Others
The court affirmed the authority of the Government to dissolve the Andhra Pradesh Bhoodan Yagna Board, emphasizing adherence to procedural fairness and the necessity of specific grounds for such acti....
The court upheld that the removal of appointed members is lawful under the doctrine of pleasure, affirming no violation of natural justice or constitutional rights as per the Societies Registration A....
The Governor's power to remove nominated Chairmen of Zilla Grandhalaya Samsthas under Section 11(3) of the Act is not absolute and is subject to the procedure prescribed under Section 18-A of the Act....
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to procedural fairness, including the necessity of evidence and consideration of the employee's defense, to ensure just outcomes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.