SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 994

N. TUKARAMJI
Telugu Narendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : P. Animi Reddy.

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and representation. (Para 1)
2. context of the juvenile justice board's order. (Para 2 , 3)
3. parties' arguments regarding age of ccl. (Para 4 , 5)
4. prosecution's evidence on age of ccl. (Para 6 , 7)
5. analysis of relevant provisions of jj act. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
6. contravention of statutory directive. (Para 11)
7. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT :

(N. Tukaramji, J.)

1. Heard Mr. P. Anim Reddy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Mr. M. Muralidhar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent.

2. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed assailing the order dated 23.06.2022 in C.C. No. 19 of 2022 on the file of V Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-Principal Magistrate of Juvenile Justice Board at Hyderabad.

3. In the impugned order the Juvenile Justice Board on preliminary assessment under Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short, 'the J.J. Act') adjudged that the revision petitioner/ Child in Conflict with law (hereinafter 'the CCL') has to be transferred to the Children's Court.

4. The contest of the revision petitioner is that even as per the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top