SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2405

SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI
X – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. timeline and procedural facts surrounding the juvenile's case. (Para 2 , 9 , 12 , 14 , 15)
2. preliminary assessment's procedural and substantive compliance. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 13)
3. court's interpretation of legal standards under the jj act, 2015. (Para 8 , 10 , 11)
4. court remand for reconsideration of juvenile's case. (Para 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.

Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Arpit Malviya, Advocate holding brief of Shri Awadhesh Kumar Malviya, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

2. The Present Criminal Revision has been preferred by the revisionist under section 102 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as "JJ Act, 2015") against the judgment dated 7.9.2021 passed by Special Judge, POCSO Act, Court No. 1, Ghazipur in Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 2021, whereby the appellate court has rejected the Criminal appeal and affirmed the order dated 26.2.2021 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Ghazipur, whereby the Juvenile Justice Board, sent the case of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top