A.RAJASEKHAR REDDY
K. Raghavendra Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. These writ petitions are taken-up together because the common issue involved in these cases is regarding revocation of arms licences granted to them under provisions of the Arms Act, 1959 Act on the ground that there is no threat perception to the petitioners.
2. In W.P. No. 8834 of 2019, initially licence was granted to the petitioner in the year 2012 for a period of three years and the same was renewed upto 2018 and he applied for renewal. In W.P. No. 2673 of 2019, the petitioner also applied for renewal of arms licence after expiry of his licence, the licensing authority called for report in both the cases from the concerned authorities and after obtaining reports, show-cause notices were issued to the petitioners as to why their licences should not be revoked by exercising powers under Section 17 of the Arms Act (for short “the Act”) and the petitioners submitted explanation. But without considering the same in proper perspective, only on the ground that petitioners do not have threat perception, the impugned orders have been passed revoking the arms licences purportedly in exercise of powers under Section 17 of the Act.
3. In W.P. No. 2673 of 2019, counter-affidavit is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.