IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SURENDER, J.
Mohd. Jeelani - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor and Anr. - Respondents
Criminal Petition No. 889 Of 2015
Decided On : 20-10-2022
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 363 - Kidnapping from lawful guardianship - Seeking to quash FIR – Held, petitioner is natural and legal guardian of his children even after separation of petitioner and complainant by divorce - Petitioner who is father and natural guardian of children cannot be prosecuted for offence under Section 363 of Indian Penal Code -There is no order by any competent Court granting custody of children to complainant - Criminal Petition is allowed.
ORDER :
This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’), is filed seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.396 of 2014 on the file of Saidabad Police Station against the petitioner. The petitioner herein is accused in the said crime. The offence alleged him is under Section 363 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the record.
3. According to the complaint filed on 18.11.2014, the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant stated that four months prior to the complaint, her daughter namely Mybhin and her younger son Mohd.Omer Farooq were taken away by her husband from her residence. Again on 15.11.2014 her elder son Mohd.Abdul Quavi was taken away by her husband from school. The children were in her custody and when asked, the father of the petitioner informed that the children will be handed over, but, failed to hand over the children and as such she requested to take necessary action against the petitioner.
4. On the basis of the said complaint, police registered the present FIR for the offence under Section 363 of the Indian Penal code.
5. Section 361 of Indian Penal Code reads as follows;
6. Admittedly, the petitioner is none other than the husband of the defacto complainant and biological father of the children. He is the natural guardian of the children. Admittedly, a case vide O.P.SR.No.7051 of 2014 filed by the petitioner herein in the month of December, 2014 for custody and for appointing him as natural guardian of his children, was pending before the Family Court, City civil Courts, Hyderabad; and that the children are in his custody.
7. Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code makes kidnapping a punishable offence and whoever kidnaps a minor or entices any minor under the age of 16 in case of male or under the age of 18 in case of female, without consent of the guardian, is said to kidnap such minor from lawful guardianship.
8. The petitioner is the natural and legal guardian of his children even after the separation of the petitioner and the complainant by divorce on 11.11.2014. For the said reason, the petitioner who is the father and natural guardian of the children cannot be prosecuted for the offence under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code. There is no order by any competent Court granting custody of the children to the complainant.
9. The Honourable Supreme Court in Chandrakala Menon (MRS) v. Vipin Menon (CAPT), (1993) 2 SCC 6, held that taking away of the minor daughter by the father will not amount to kidnapping.
10. No offence is made out against the petitioner for taking his own children to take care of them, by no stretch of imagination the act of the petitioner can be termed as kidnap. For the said reasons, the proceedings in Crime No.396 of 2014 against the petitioner for the offence under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, cannot be allowed to continue and are liable to be quashed.
11. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the FIR in Crime No.396 of 2014 on the file of the Saidabad Police Station against the petitioner/accused, is quashed.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
A father cannot be charged with kidnapping his own child from the mother’s custody unless a court order restricts his guardianship rights.
Right of mother to custody of children is not absolute right and that right is not superior to right of lawful guardian.
Under Mohammedan law, the father is the natural and legal guardian of the minor children. The mother's right to the custody of the children is not absolute and is subject to the right of the lawful g....
A father cannot be charged with kidnapping his own child from the custody of the mother unless there is a court order prohibiting him from doing so, as both parents are considered lawful guardians un....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'taking' and 'enticing' a minor under Section 361 IPC, and the court's exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C....
A biological father taking lawful custody of his children with the mother's consent does not constitute kidnapping under Section 361 IPC.
The court established that actions taken by a minor nearing the age of majority, when coupled with voluntary choice, negate allegations of kidnapping under IPC.
Father being a natural and lawful guardian, removal by him of his son below 5 years of age from his mother is not an offence under Section 361 of IPC.
The welfare and interest of the child are of paramount consideration in custody disputes, and the role of a mother as a lawful guardian is crucial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.