Raj Kumar Chaurasia vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Raj Kumar Chaurasia – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent

Table of Content
1. registration of fir based on complaint of kidnapping. (Para 2 , 5)
2. arguments by both parties regarding the nature of the relationship and allegations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's analysis on the age and consent of 'k' in relation to section 363 ipc. (Para 10 , 14)
4. application of section 482 cr.p.c to prevent abuse of law. (Para 16 , 18)
5. conclusion quashing the fir and ensuring justice. (Para 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C is for quashing FIR No.38/2021 dated 07.002.2021 registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar East for offences under Section 363 IPC.

2. The instant FIR was registered on the complaint of one Chanda Devi W/o Jugal Mandal. It is stated that the complainant is a housewife and lives at C-405, Peeragarhi Camp, Paschim Vihar, East Delhi, along with her husband and six children, out of which four are girls and two are boys. It is stated that her youngest daughter "K" is studying in 11th standard. It is further stated that on 06.02.2021 "K" went to school and did not return back. It is stated that "K" was born on 15.03.2003, she has wheatish complexion and her height is about 4'10". It is stated tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSUBRAMONIUM PRASADRaj Kumar Chaurasia – AppellantVersusState (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Raj Kumar Chaurasia – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent