KUNURU LAKSHMAN
Oruganti Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
P. Ravindar Goud – Respondent
ORDER :
Kunuru Lakshman, J.
1. Challenging the order dated 22.07.2022 passed in I.A. No. 555 of 2017 in O.S. No. 37 of 2009 by the learned Principle Junior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar, the petitioners/plaintiffs have filed the present Revision.
2. Heard Sri K. Chaitanya, learned counsel for the petitioners. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of respondents. Perused the record.
3. The petitioners/plaintiffs have filed the aforesaid suit O.S. No. 37 of 2009 initially for perpetual injunction. During the pendency of the aforesaid suit, they have filed an application vide I.A. No. 555 of 2017 under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'CPC') and Order I Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 of CPC seeking to amend the pleadings and to implead respondent Nos. 3 to 21 therein as defendant Nos. 3 to 21 to the suit on the following grounds:-
i) Originally the land admeasuring Ac. 2.08 guntas in Sy. No. 7 (bounded by East: Sy. No. 8, West: Sy. No. 6, North: Railway line, South: remaining land in Sy. No. 7) situated within the limits of Yenugonda village belongs to A. Ramesh
ii) He sold the said land to four persons it eluding 1st petitioner and husba
B.K. Narayana Pillai v. Parameswaran Pillai (2000) 1 SCC 712
M. Revanna Vs. Anjanamma (Dead) by Legal Representatives (2019) 4 SCC 332
Pankaja Vs. Yellappa (dead) by Legal Representatives (2004) 6 SCC 415
Revajeet Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and sons (2009) 10 SCC 84
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.