ORDER :

Chillakur Sumalatha, J.

1. This is an application filed seeking the Court to permit the petitioners/proposed parties to come on record as respondent Nos. 10 and 11 to the appeal.

2. Heard Ms. P. Krishna Keertana, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri Palle Sriharinath, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and Sri V. Ravinder Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 5 to 13.

3. Making her submission, learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners are the subsequent purchasers of the suit schedule property and thus, as their interest is involved, they may be permitted to come on record as parties to the appeal.

4. Vehemently opposing the submission thus made, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4, who are the appellants to the appeal, states that the petitioners are neither necessary parties nor proper parties to the appeal and therefore, this application is not maintainable.

5. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 5 to 13 submits that the petitioners are not the subsequent purchasers. Learned counsel states that indeed, an interim order was granted restraining the appellants from alienating the property to th