Back
Challagondla Sharada Devi W/o Narasimha Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The subject matter of these two (02) Writ Petitions is one and the same and between the same parties and hence, both the Writ Petitions are disposed of by this Common Order.
2. The petitioner in both the Writ Petitions is one Challagondla Sharada Devi, who is the daughter of Smt. Takkellapati Usha Rani, daughter of Late Vipparla Mangaiah. It is the case of the petitioner that her grandfather, namely Vipparla Mangaiah, was the original owner and pattadar of land admeasuring Acs. 12.00 gts. situated in Sy. Nos. 335, 365, 276 and 277 of Raghunadhapalem Village, Khammam Urban Mandal, Khammam District, and he executed a registered gift settlement deed, dated 07-04-1971 in favour of the mother of the petitioner namely smt. Takkellapati Usha Rani, vide Doc. No. 945 of 1971 in respect of the said extent of land. It is also the case of the petitioner that the said land, which was gifted in favour of the petitioner’s mother, was included in the holding of Sri Vipparla Mangaiah under the proceedings initiated under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and the said extent of land was finally deleted from the holding of the said Sri Vipparla Mangaiah, as the same was gifte
The delay in challenging mutation and regularization proceedings, as well as the absence of challenge to said proceedings, can bar a petitioner from seeking relief. Lack of evidence of possession can....
Administrative authorities cannot regularize disputed transactions under Section 5-A of the ROR Act; such matters must be resolved by civil courts.
The court reaffirmed that judicial authorities must adhere to principles of natural justice, ensuring all parties are heard before any adverse decisions are made.
The court emphasized that appeals filed beyond statutory limitation periods cannot be entertained, reaffirming the importance of adherence to procedural timelines in resolving land disputes.
The revisional jurisdiction under Section 9 of the ROR Act cannot be exercised after a long delay, and the settled rights of a person under the ROR Act cannot be unsettled after a lapse of more than ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
