UJJAL BHUYAN, SUREPALLI NANDA
VANPIC Ports Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement, Rep. by Assistant Director, Hyderabad – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
UJJAL BHUYAN, J.
Heard Mr. Atul Nanda, learned Senior Counsel for Mr. Tarun G. Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. T. Surya Karan Reddy, learned Additional Solicitor General of India for Mr. Anil Prasad Tiwari, learned standing counsel, Enforcement Directorate for the respondent.
2. This is an appeal under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 assailing the order dated 26.07.2019 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money Laundering Act at New Delhi (briefly, ‘the Appellate Tribunal’ hereinafter) in FPA-PMLA-751/DLI/2014 to the limited extent of continuation of attachment of the property of the appellant. A consequential prayer has been made by the appellant for a direction to the respondent to release the said property from attachment.
Facts:
3. Appellant is a company and is a Special Purpose Vehicle for implementation of the Vodarevu and Nizampatnam Ports and Industrial Corridor Project, also known as VANPIC Project. VANPIC Project is a Government to Government project conceptualised by virtue of an arrangement between Gove
Biswanath Bhattacharya v. Union of India
Calcutta Discount Company Limited v. Income Tax Officer
Divisional Forest Officer v. G.V. Sudhakar Rao
Income Tax Officer v. Lakhmani Mewal Das
J.Sekar @ Sekar Reddy v. Directorate of Enforcement
Opto Circuit India Limited v. Axis Bank
Radheshyam Kejriwal v. State of West Bengal
S.Narayanappa v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore
Tata Chemicals Limited v. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Jamnagar
The court upheld the necessity of exhausting statutory remedies under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act before invoking writ jurisdiction, affirming that 'proceeds of crime' includes property in....
Point of law: Provisional attachment - Adjudicating Authority does not become functus officio on expiry of the period of 180 days from the passing of the order of provisional attachment unless such o....
The court emphasized the availability of an alternate efficacious remedy within the scope of the PMLA Act and upheld the decision to relegate the Appellant/Bank to the Adjudicating Authority.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.