IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK, J.
M/s. Umark Apparels - Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana - Respondent
Writ Petition No.3767 of 2025
Decided On : 09-06-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks relief for rejection of electricity connection. (Para 1 , 2 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments regarding entitlement for electricity connection. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondent's justification for rejecting the electricity connection application. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's review of the application and relevant regulations. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 5. supreme court's interpretation of rights related to shelter and electricity. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. court's decision to set aside the rejection order. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER:
PULLA KARTHIK, J.
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“… declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly Respondent No.4 in rejecting the application of the petitioner dated 27.12.2024 for release of new electricity connection under Industrial Category vide Letter bearing Lr. No. ADE/OP/BLNR-SD XVI/ D.No.1055/2024-25, dated 24.01.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and contrary to Article 14, 19 and 21 A of the Constitution of India and may be pleased to set aside the rejection letter dated 24.01.2025 in the interest of justice.”
2) Heard Sri R. Vinod Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energy for respondent No.1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4, and learned Government Pleader for Industries & Commerce for respondent No.5.
3) Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh has established a Cooperative Industrial Estate Limited, Balanagar, in the land admeasuring Acs.47-00 guntas and the said land was allotted to the Cooperative Industrial Estate Unit Holder Association. Ever since the allotment, the members of the said Association are in possession and are carrying on the industrial/manufacturing activities. Further, some of the original allottees have leased out different portions of the land to some individuals who are also carrying on industrial activities. Likewise, petitioner has taken on lease a portion of industrial area admeasuring 300 sq. mtrs. allotted to one Mr. D. Sudershan and the service connection was being utilized by all the persons in common. In the said land, petitioner has established a small scale industry in the name of M/s.Umark Apparels and the said industry is registered under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) on 09.10.2013 and accordingly petitioner has been manufacturing various products such as tableware, kitchenware, furniture as per the demand in the market. Learned counsel has further stated that the Cooperative Industrial Estate has been established in the year 1961 and since then industries are functioning in the entire industrial area. Further, the original allottees and the tenants are repeatedly requesting the government to regularize the land to enable the lease holders to utilize the regular land for industrial purpose by erecting industrial sheds, etc. Further, vide Memo dated 28.02.2019, the Government of Telangana, Industries and Commerce Department, directed to maintain status quo in respect of the subject land. It is further contended that the GHMC has served Occupier Notice dated 17.09.2020 issued under Section 276 of the HMC Act, 1955, on the petitioner to pay the outstanding taxes in respect of the subject premises i.e. H.No.6-9-10/NR, Plot No.A-9, CIE-Balanagar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, and in compliance thereof, petitioner has paid Rs.10,600/- towards its share in municipal taxes and thereafter, petitioner has submitted a representation dated 30.09.2022 to respondent No.5 to regularize the land which is in its possession. Vide letter dated 26.10.2022, petitioner was informed to pay an amount of Rs.1,81,55,280/- for conversion of the said land and submit proof thereof. Further, as the amounts demanded are disproportionate to the incomes generated by small scale industries, Association filed W.P. No.2811 of 2023 and tenants have filed W.P. Nos.27094 and 26096 of 2023 and negotiations of lease ho
The right to electricity is integral to the right to live with dignity, and arbitrary rejection of an application for service connection violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.
An occupier is entitled to apply for an electricity connection under the Electricity Act, 2003 and HPERC Regulations, and the lack of ownership of the land does not preclude the occupier from seeking....
Electricity Connection - Duty of licensee to supply on request - It is duty of distribution licensee to provide connection to every eligible applicant by taking necessary steps for which respondents ....
An occupier in lawful possession of premises is entitled to seek electricity connection under Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, despite ongoing property ownership disputes.
Settled possession grants rights to basic utilities, regardless of property ownership disputes.
Occupiers have a statutory right to electricity supply regardless of the landlord's disputes, which must be resolved in appropriate civil venues.
Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is mandatory for providing electricity to owners or occupiers irrespective of landlord's arrears, recognizing access to electricity as a human right.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.