Arshinapalli Rajitha vs A. Vidyasagar Rao - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 92

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 92

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Arshinapalli Rajitha – Appellant
Versus
A. Vidyasagar Rao – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : JAGAN MOHAN PERUMANDLA
For the Respondent: MANDHATA SLK SRUTHA KEERTHI

Table of Content
1. dispute over land possession necessitates local survey. (Para 3 , 4)
2. trial court's jurisdiction upheld in appointing a commissioner. (Para 10 , 11)

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the order dated 02.09.2024 in I.A.No.168 of 2024 in O.S.No.1146 of 2022 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Jayashankar, Bhupalpally (hereinafter referred to as “the trial Court”)

2. The revision petitioner herein is the respondent/plaintiff and respondent is the petitioner/defendant before the trial Court. For convenience and clarity, the parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed before the trial Court.

3. The case of the petitioner before the trial Court is that he has filed a petition under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying the Court to appoint an advocate commissioner to determine the survey number of the land (suit schedule property) which is in the possession and enjoyment of the respondent with the assistance of Assistant Director for Survey and Land Records, Warangal and with the help of tippon and village map of Buddaram. The suit