Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J.SREENIVAS RAO
Marati Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition disposed of with directions. (Para 1 , 4 , 10) |
| 2. respondent argues petitioner's approach is premature. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. court permits petitioner to submit objections. (Para 3 , 9) |
| 4. petitioner claims ownership of agricultural land. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“to issue Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandmus declaring the Notice of 4th Respondent/Tahsildar issued vide Lr. No. 2025 dated. 08.05.2025 for the purpose of dispossession showing the cause of excess land stated as proposed correction/deletion of Petitioners agricultral land an extent of Ac. 1.00 in Sy. No. 41/1E/3 and Ac. 1.00 Gts. in Sy. No. 41 in Parvathapur Village, Kondurg Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as ultra-vires, illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice guaranteed under Articles 14, 21, 300A of Constitution of India and against the provisions of Bhu Bharati (Records of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 and subsequently direct the official respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to follow the procedure as per the Law pertains to Petitioners agricultural land an extent of Ac. 1.00 in Sy. No. 41/1E/
Parties must be allowed to present their objections to dispossession notices, ensuring compliance with due process and principles of natural justice.
The court affirmed the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, requiring authorities to allow petitioners to explain their claim before any dispossession of property.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
