Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J.SREENIVAS RAO
Namburi Mukherjee Victor – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for mandamus relief. (Para 1) |
| 2. disposal of writ petition and cost order. (Para 4 , 11) |
| 3. claim of property ownership and prior surveys. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. writ petition maintainability challenged. (Para 7) |
| 5. directions for considering objections and restraining dispossession. (Para 8 , 10) |
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the Respondents Nos. 3 to 6 in frequently interfering and trying to dispossess the petitioners from their agricultural lands in Sy.Nos.222/A/AA/6, to an extent of Ac.5-00 gts, in Sy.No.222/s/s/1 to an extent of Ac.5-00gts, in Sy.No.222/A/AA/5 to an extent of Ac.5-00 gts, total admeasuring Ac.15-00 gts, situated at Erragunta Revenue Village, Vemsoor Mandal, Khammam District, under the guise of Survey, as illegal, arbitrary in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India, against the provisions of Surveys, settlements in Land Records and in violation of principles of natural justice and against all settled principles of law and consequently direct the Respondents Nos. 3 to 6 no
Court emphasizes adherence to principles of natural justice, requiring authorities to consider objections before conducting new surveys on agricultural land ownership disputes.
The court affirmed the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, requiring authorities to allow petitioners to explain their claim before any dispossession of property.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
