Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Javvaji Naveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY, J.
This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the Registering Authorities in refusing to register the subject documents presented by the petitioner, based on the Gazette Notification R.R.No.83, dated 25.09.2013, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of house bearing No.06-653/363 (PTIN No.1250113990), admeasuring 90.0 square yards in Sy.No.107 situated at NTR Nagar, Suraram Colony, Suraram Village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. The case of the petitioner is that when he intended to dispossess the said property in favour of third party, respondent No.3 refused to receive the sale deed for registration on the ground that the petitioner’s property is under prohibitory list as per Section 22A of the registration Act basing on the following information:
(a) The property is government land notified as prohibited under Section 22A of the Act as per Ranga Reddy District Collector Gazette notification R.R.No.83, Communicated by the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy vide File No.E5/4730/2013/Qutubullapur/Nizampet, dated 25.09
The court ruled that a notification inviting objections does not constitute a valid basis for refusing property registration under the Registration Act, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the refusal for registration of properties based on defective notifications under Section 22-A of the Registration Act was illegal, arbitrary,....
The court ruled that a notification inviting objections cannot serve as a basis for denying registration of documents under the Registration Act, 1908.
The court ruled that a notification inviting objections does not constitute a valid basis for denying registration of documents under the Registration Act, 1908.
The court ruled that a notification inviting objections does not constitute a valid basis for refusing registration of documents under the Registration Act.
The court established that proper notifications and adherence to guidelines are essential for enforcing prohibitions on property registration under Section 22(A) of the Registration Act.
The court ruled that land cannot be classified as prohibited under Section 22-A without proper Gazette notification, allowing registration of sale deeds.
Notification under S.22-A(2) of the Registration Act essential for prohibiting registration of documents concerning government land.
The Sub-Registrar must register documents presented for registration unless legally prohibited, following the Registration Act's provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
