Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T.MADHAVI DEVI
Nizamuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
T. MADHAVI DEVI, J.
In this Writ Petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dt. 06.06.2022 in Case No.212/2021/A3-PTS passed by the 2nd respondent dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 121 of the Panchayat Raj Act, by confirming the order dt. 21.09.2020 passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting the application filed by the petitioner for permission to construct a building in and over the property assigned to the petitioner herein, i.e., plot admeasuring 100 square yards in Survey No.513 of Muthangi Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District, vide Lr.No.184/GPM/2020 dt. 21.09.2020, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to grant permission as sought for.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present Writ Petition are that the petitioner claims to be a landless poor and therefore, the Government of Andhra Pradesh has allotted a residential plot admeasuring 100 square yards in Survey No.513 of Muthangi Village in the year 1998 to the petitioner to enable him to construct a small house and vide proceedings No.B/1313/1998, permission was granted to c
The court cannot intervene in matters of land allotment cancellation without a challenge to the cancellation order and evidence of compliance with the conditions of the allotment.
Point of law: There is a presumption that public officials would discharge their duties honestly and in accordance with law. Even administrative power to be exercised to fulfill real purpose and not ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
