SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 368

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK, J.
Smt. P.Pavani - Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Chief Commissioner of Land Administration - Respondent
Writ Petition Nos.28040 Of 2023 & 27064 and 28764 Of 2024
Decided On : 02-05-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : D BALA KISHAN RAO
For the Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES I

Adhoc promotions do not confer seniority rights until requisite qualifications are met, and failure to timely challenge regularization conditions undermines claims for seniority.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, and 21 - Seniority disputes - Petitioners challenged the final seniority list issued by respondent authorities, claiming it was illegal and arbitrary as it counted seniority from the date of passing the Survey Training Test instead of the date of promotion. (Paras 3, 4, 5, 11)

(B) Promotion and Seniority - The court held that adhoc promotions do not confer any right to seniority until requisite qualifications are met, reaffirming that temporary promotions cannot be treated as qualifying service for seniority. (Paras 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners were originally appointed as Junior Assistants and promoted to Senior Assistants with a condition to pass the Survey Training Test. Their seniority was altered in the final list, which they claimed was unjust. (Paras 4, 4.1, 4.2)

Findings of Court:
The court found no merit in the petitions, emphasizing that the petitioners were aware of the regularization conditions and failed to challenge them in a timely manner. (Paras 12, 16)

Issues: The main issues included the legality of the seniority list and the conditions of adhoc promotions affecting seniority.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners' seniority could not be counted from the date of promotion due to the conditions attached to their adhoc promotions, which were clearly stated in the promotion orders. (Paras 10, 11)

Result: Writ Petitions dismissed.

ORDER :

(PULLA KARTHIK, J.)

Since the lis involved in all these writ petitions is inter se related with each other, they are taken up together and being disposed of by this common order.

2) Heard Sri D.Bala Kishan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.Nos.28040 of 2023, 27064 and 28764 of 2024 and learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the respondent authorities. In spite of service of notice on respondent No.6 in W.P.No.28040 of 2023, none appeared on her behalf.

3) Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 in issuing the seniority list dated 21.09.2024 duly counting the seniority of the petitioners from the date of passing of Survey Training Test instead from the date of promotion, W.P.Nos.28040 of 2023 and 27064 and 28764 of 2024 are filed.

4) The case of the petitioners in W.P.No.28040 of 2023 is that originally they were appointed as Junior Assistants on 01.07.2013 after due selection through Group-IV Services and allotted to erstwhile Mahabubnagar District. Thereafter, they were promoted to the post of Senior Assistants vide Proc.No.A2/2945/2016, dated 10.10.2016, with a precondition to pass the Survey Training within one year. Accordingly, they joined in the said posts and are working as such. Thereafter, they were deputed to Survey Training held between 28.12.2016 to 07.02.2017 in second spell and accordingly they have completed the training within the period of probation. However, their services were regularized in the post of Senior Assistant from the date of completion of survey training i.e. 13.06.2017 vide Proc.No.A1/672/2016, dated 19.06.2017, instead from the date of their promotion to the said post on 10.10.2016, which is clearly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. It is further submitted that after creation of new Districts, the services of the petitioners were taken over to the control of O/o. Collectorate, Rangareddy District. While so, the provisional seniority list in the cadre of Senior Assistant dated 30.06.2023 was communicated by respondent No.3 wherein the names of petitioner were included at Sl.Nos.36, 38 and 40 respectively. But, based on the objections raised by some of the employees, the official respondents have issued the final seniority list of Senior Assistants working in Ranga Reddy District vide Lr.No.A1/2328/2023, dated 05.09.2023, pushing down the names of the petitioners to Sl.Nos.78, 79 and 80 duly taking the date of passing the survey training test, which is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

4.1) Similarly, the case of the petitioners in W.P.No.27064 of 2024 is that they were originally appointed as Junior Assistants in erstwhile Medak District during the year 2013 and thereafter they have passed Revenue Test Part I, II and III, Accounts Test for Subordinate Officers Part-I. It is further submitted that based on the promotions given by the District Collector, Mahabubnagar, to several Junior Assistants who have completed three years services, passed Revenue and Accounts Tests, but could not complete Survey Training, to the cadre of Senior Assistants, petitioners herein have also made representation dated 09.05.2017 to consider their case for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant. Considering the same, respondent No.3 issued Proc.No.A2/708/2017, dated 18.05.2017, promoting these petitioners temporarily to the cadre of Senior Assistants with a precondition to pass the Survey Training Test within one year. Accordingly, they are working as Senior Assistants. Thereafter, they were deputed to Survey Training held between 28.12.2016 to 07.02.2017 in the second spell and they have completed the same within the period of probation. Consequently, respondent No.3 has issued Proc.No.A2/708/2017, dated 04.07.2017 revoking the condition and regularizing their services in the post of Senior Assistant w.e.f.04.07.2017 instead from the date of their promoti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top