SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 432

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN
Viskela Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Srinidhi Chits Hyderabad Pvt. Ltd – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SOURABH AGARWAL

ORDER :

K. LAKSHMAN, J.

Heard Mr.Sourabh Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioners. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2.

2. This revision is filed under Section - 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12.11.2024 passed in E.P. No.306 of 2024 in Arbitration Case ARB No.230 of 2023 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Karimnagar.

3. On the application filed by respondent No.1 vide Arbitration Case ARB No.230 of 2023, the Chit Arbitrator/Deputy Registrar of Chits, Warangal, had passed an award dated 29.04.2024 directing the petitioners herein and respondent No.2 to pay an amount of Rs.3,88,760/- along with interest @ 18% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.3,43,943/- from the date of filing the dispute till the date of realization jointly and severally. They shall also pay Rs.9,780/- towards costs of the arbitration proceedings.

4. Pursuant to the said award, respondent No.1 herein had filed an execution petition vide E.P. No.306 of 2024 in ARB No.230 of 2023 seeking execution of the said award against the petitioners herein and respondent No.2 for recovery of Rs.4,19,745/- from them. Vide the aforesaid o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top