Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.LAKSHMAN
E Raju M Raju – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the writ petitions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding registration of firs. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. details of the incidents and allegations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. legal principles on multiple fir registrations. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. observations from prior case law on firs. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. principle confirmation in related judgments. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. conditions for permissible multiple firs. (Para 26 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. court observations on legal principles of fir registration. (Para 30) |
| 9. court's final order on quashing firs. (Para 39 , 44) |
| 10. final ruling quashing the additional firs. (Para 42) |
ORDER :
(K. LAKSHMAN, J.)
Heard Mr. M.A.K. Mukheed, Mr. T.V.Ramana Rao, Mr. Ramu Nallamothu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Aniketh Reddy, learned Asst. Govt. Pleader for Home, appearing for State.
2. These writ petitions are filed to declare the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 6 in registering FIR Nos. 154 and 155 of 2024 of P.S. Bomraspet pertaining to the same incident which is the subject matter of FIR No.153 of 2024 and consequently quash the proceedings in Cr.Nos.154 and 155 of 2024.
3. In the light of the same
The court held that multiple FIRs cannot be registered for the same incident under established legal principles, emphasizing prohibitions against successive registrations when based on identical clai....
Multiple FIRs cannot be registered for the same incident arising from identical accusations against the same parties, highlighting abuse of process and procedural injustice.
Point of law: scope of doctrine of double jeopardy, observing that “in order to attract the provisions of Article 20(2) of the Constitution, there must have been both prosecution and punishment in re....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of the First Information Report and the test of 'sameness' to determine the permissibility of multiple FIRs for the same occurrence.
Two separate FIR - Investigation - Permissible - Simultaneous investigation would not amount to fresh investigation. Interference in a matter where the earliest information prima facie makes out cogn....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
