Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Surepalli Nanda
K. Maheshwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Surepalli Nanda, J.
Heard Sri V.Ravichandran, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for revenue appearing on behalf of respondents.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
“…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in continuing the disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner pursuant to Charge Memo No. A3/1138/2007 dated 27-01-2011 issued by the 3rd Respondent and thereby denying promotion to the post of Senior Assistant on the ground of pendency of disciplinary proceedings as being arbitrary, illegal, vitiated by un-explained laches and delay, contrary to the time limit stipulated for completion of enquiries in G.O. Ms. No. 679 dated 01- 11-2008 and provisions of Rule 20 of TSCS (CC and A) Rules, 1991 and to the law laid down in (1995) 2 SCC 570 and W.P.No.11294 of 2013 and batch dated 25-06- 2013 and further be pleased to hold that the Petitioner is entitled to have his claim considered and be promoted as Senior Assistant with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice and to
Disciplinary proceedings prolonged without resolution can be deemed arbitrary, violating principles of fairness and justice, thereby affecting employee promotions.
Prolonged delay in disciplinary proceedings can lead to quashing charges, as it causes undue mental stress, aligning with judicial precedents.
Unexplained delay and lethargy in the disposal of disciplinary proceedings can lead to the quashing of the proceedings, especially when the employee has suffered mental agony and suffering due to the....
Timely completion of disciplinary inquiries is essential for safeguarding the career advancement rights of government employees.
Excessive delay in disciplinary proceedings, attributable to the inaction of the State, can lead to the quashing of the proceedings, especially when the delay violates the petitioner's right to a spe....
The right to an expedient conclusion of disciplinary proceedings is essential to protect employee dignity and uphold public interest.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
