Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Bijjala Eshwar Rao – Appellant
Versus
Bodlapati Satyanarayana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. plaintiff's application for injunction. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. trial court's findings on possession. (Para 8) |
| 4. overview of appeals and counterarguments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's analysis of evidence and findings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. final ruling and order. (Para 16) |
ORDER :
(B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J.)
This civil revision petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 10.02.2025 in C.M.A. No.20 of 2023 passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Khammam (for short ‘appellate court’) affirming the order dated 01.08.2023 in I.A. No.2 of 2023 in O.S. No.759 of 2023 passed by the learned IV Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mobile Court, Khammam (for short ‘trial Court’).
2. The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant in the suit in O.S. No.759 of 2023 and for the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as arrayed in the suit.
3. The plaintiff instituted suit in O.S. No.759 of 2023 on the file of the trial Court for grant of perpetual injunction restraining the defendant and his henchmen from interf
A plaintiff must substantiate claims of imminent harm with clear evidence to warrant a temporary injunction against interference with possession, recognizing the rights of defendants to survey their ....
The plaintiff's request for permanent injunction was denied as he failed to prove adverse possession and the defendant was adjudged the lawful owner of the disputed land.
A suit for perpetual injunction is not maintainable when encroachment is established, particularly if the land has been acquired by the state, barring the plaintiff's cause of action.
In property disputes involving conflicting claims, the court must evaluate the evidence presented to determine the balance of convenience and the necessity for a trial to resolve ownership issues.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in a suit for injunction, the court's principal obligation is to examine the plaintiff's lawful possession, and the identification of prope....
Proper identification of properties based on respective title deeds supported by old survey plan and new survey plan is necessary to grant reliefs sought in a suit for injunction and counter claim fo....
A simple suit for injunction is not maintainable when there is a dispute over title, and the plaintiffs must prove possession within the claimed boundaries.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
