SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 624

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI
M.Lachavva – Appellant
Versus
Neeraja, Now W/o.Harish Kumar Kottawar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K M MAHENDER REDDY

Table of Content
1. overview of appeal and compensation claims details. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 15)
2. remarriage's implications on compensation entitlement. (Para 9 , 12 , 16 , 17)
3. legal interpretation of widow's right to compensation. (Para 10 , 11 , 13 , 14)
4. court's dismissal of the appeal. (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

M.G.Priyadarsini, J.

Aggrieved by the Common Judgment and Decree dated 19.10.2006 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal – cum - I Additional District Judge, Nizamabad (hereinafter will be referred as ‘Tribunal”) in O.P.No.677 of 2000 and O.P.No.45 of 2002, the petitioner/claimant in O.P.No.677 of 2000 i.e., mother of the deceased filed the present Appeal to modify the common judgment and decree dated 19.10.2006 and thereby prayed to dismiss the O.P.No.45 of 2002.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter are referred as they were arrayed before the Tribunal.

3. The brief facts of the case as can be seen from the record are that the petitioner filed claim petition under Section 166 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT claiming compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- from the respondent Nos.2 and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top