Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
L. Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
Telangana Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident leading to dismissal of the appellant (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against dismissal (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. court's observations on the inquiry process (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 4. legal principle on multiple inquiries (Para 34) |
| 5. conclusion to reinstate the appellant (Para 38) |
JUDGMENT :
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty, J.
This Writ Appeal is filed aggrieved by the order passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.32623 of 2017 dated 03.05.2024.
2. Heard Sri T.Suryakaran Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri K.Sita Ram, learned counsel for the appellant on record, and Sri S.Bopal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
3. The facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that the appellant was appointed as Watchman in the year 1986 and was posted at APSWRS/Junior College (Girls), Mattampally, Nalgonda District, and he was transferred to APSWRS (Girls), G.V.Gudem, Nalgonda in the month of January 1999.
4. An incident occurred on the intervening night of 31.08.2000/ 01.09.2000, when an unidentified person, allegedly under the infl
A second inquiry into the same charges is impermissible without new evidence, and principles of natural justice must be upheld during departmental inquiries.
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to established procedures to ensure fairness, especially in serious allegations of moral turpitude.
Point of law: High Court is not a court of appeal over the decision of the authorities holding a departmental enquiry against a public servant. It is concerned to determine whether the enquiry is hel....
In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is the normal rule. The onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employe....
statement recorded in the preliminary enquiry, which are behind the back of the Applicant, and for which he had no opportunity to cross-examine them, cannot be used in regular inquiry, as the delinqu....
Vigilance department cannot appoint its own officers as enquiry officers in disciplinary proceedings to ensure impartiality and natural justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
