IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SURENDER, ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
Potham Jagannadham Naidu @ Jagan – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Accused Nos.1 and 2 were tried for the offence of murder by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in SC.No.374/2015, wherein, A1 was convicted and A2 was acquitted.
2. Criminal Appeal No.405 of 2016 is filed by Accused No.1 questioning his conviction recorded by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in SC.No.374/2015 for the offences under Sections 302 , 379 and 201 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and sentencing him to undergo Imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence under Section 302 of IPC ; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- for the offence under Section 379 of IPC ; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence under Section 201 of IPC .
3. Criminal Appeal No.1262 of 2017 is filed by the State questioning the acquittal recorded against Accused No.2 by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in SC.No.374/2015 for the offences under Sections 120-B , 364 read with 109 , 302 read with 109 , 380 read with 109 and 201 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE .
4. Since both the appeals are questioning the very same Judgment of the Se
Circumstantial evidence must be incontrovertibly established to support a conviction, with the prosecution required to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in a circumstantial evidence case, leading to the acquittal of the appellants.
Point of Law : Circumstantial Evidence - Conviction set aside - lingering doubts that pervades every aspect of the evidence led, persuades to give the accused the benefit of doubt and acquit them of ....
Point of law :Circumstantial evidence - prosecution must prove all the circumstances connecting unbroken chain of links leading to only one inference that the accused committed the crime. If any othe....
In circumstantial evidence cases, all links must cohesively establish guilt; doubts in identification and admissibility of evidence impact conviction validity.
Point of Law : Motive assumes great significance where a conviction is sought to be predicated on circumstantial evidence alone and its absence can tilt scales in favour of the accused where all the ....
Point of Law : Offence of Murder – Conviction set aside – Circumstantial evidence - In order to sustain conviction, circumstantial evidence must be complete and incapable of explanation of any other ....
Circumstantial evidence must collectively indicate guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the prosecution carries the burden to prove this in murder cases.
Circumstantial evidence, including recovery of crucial items, must be coherent and consistently point to guilt to meet the burden of proof required for conviction in murder cases.
The prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence, leading to their acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.