Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Progressive Constructions Ltd., Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Rithwik Projects Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad – Respondent
ORDER :
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.
The proposed appellant/Progressive Construction Limited, seeks leave to assail an order dated 14.10.2024 passed by the Commercial Court in Commercial Original Petition (COP.No.70 of 2023) filed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the present Appeal. The Commercial Court passed the impugned order restraining the respondent Nos.3 and 4 from revoking the Powers of Attorney dated 27.12.2006 and 17.02.2011 executed by the respondent No.3 in favour of the respondent No.2 in the present Appeal.
2. To simplify matters, the proposed appellant (Progressive) was not a party before the Commercial Court. An application to implead Progressive was ultimately not decided and the COP was instead disposed of. The Commercial Court records in paragraph 44 of the impugned order that the COP was taken up for hearing at the instance of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 and disposed of without issuing notice to Progressive.
3. The respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the present Appeal were the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 in the COP before the Commercial Court. The respondent No.3 in the Appeal was the respondent No.1 in the COP and the respondent No.4 herein (authorized representative of the responde
A non-party may appeal from an order only if they demonstrate direct and independent prejudice; mere identity of interest with an affected party is insufficient.
The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the statutory provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, particularly regarding the filing of Section 34 applications during the pendency o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a Commercial Court cannot permit a party to lead fresh evidence after the matter is posted for arguments if the procedural requirements under ....
The court affirmed that judicial interference in arbitral awards is limited, focusing on the necessity of cogent reasoning and adherence to public policy.
Point of law : In order to acquire the status of aggrieved party, the person must have legal interest and an enforceable right which would in turn allowing him to question the decree or order by pref....
Procedural defects that do not go to the root of the matter should not lead to dismissal; objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act are maintainable without prior sanction from the Legal Rem....
A non-signatory party could be subjected to arbitration provided these transactions were with group of companies and there was a clear intention of the parties to bind both, the signatory as well as ....
Granting or refusing to grant any measure and set aside an arbitral award - No final adjudication of Section 9 application nor does impugned order finally decide same - Decision in application under ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
