Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ALOK ARADHE, CJ., J. SREENIVAS RAO
Jitta Surender Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kishan Bung – Respondent
ORDER:
Alok Aradhe, CJ.
Mr. R.Sushanth Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Heard on the question of admission.
3. In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 05.09.2024 passed by the Court of the Special Judge for Trial and Disposal of Commercial Disputes, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as, “the Commercial Court”), in C.O.S.No.11 of 2024 by which the interlocutory application filed by the petitioner, namely I.A.No.297 of 2024, under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), seeking rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.
4. Facts giving rise to filing of this petition briefly stated are that the respondent No.1 filed a suit seeking dissolution of the partnership firm which was constituted on 01.06.2023 as well as sought rendition of the accounts. In addition, the respondent No.1 also sought the relief to appoint a receiver to operate and run the business of the partnership firm. Along with the plaint, the respondent No.1 filed an interlocutory application, namely I.A.No.192 of 2024, seeking urgent interim relief to restrain the petitioner from operating the p
The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited and does not permit re-evaluating evidence; intervention is warranted only in cases of clear jurisdictional flaws or miscarriage....
The court upheld that urgency in a suit is determined by the latest events leading to its filing, justifying the need for urgent interim relief under section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Urgent interim relief can be granted without prior mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act if urgency is established, allowing plaintiffs to proceed with their suit.
The main legal principle established is the mandatory nature of pre-litigation mediation and the requirement for the suit to contemplate urgent interim relief under Section 12A of the Commercial Cour....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definition of 'Commercial Dispute' under Section 2(1)(c-xviii) of the Act of 2015 and the prospective effect of the manda....
Mandatory nature of Section 12-A of the Commercial Court Act 2015 and the essential requirements for invoking the power of the Court to effect an attachment before judgment under Order 38, Rule 5(1) ....
The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of Section 12-A of the Commercial Court Act 2015 and the importance of complying with the requirements for urgent interim relief.
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable if the conditions for appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are not met, emphasizing the need to adhere....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
