Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. SURENDER
Linga Narsing Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of A.P., Rep By SPL.PP. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants convicted under prevention of corruption act. (Para 1 , 2 , 7) |
| 2. details of bribery incidents and trap proceedings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. defensive arguments presented by appellants. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's reasoning on burden of proof and doubt. (Para 13 , 22) |
| 5. appeal allowed and acquittal of appellants. (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
K. SURENDER, J.
1. The appellant/A1 was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year each under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13 (2), and A2 was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months under Section 12 r/w Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 vide judgment in C.C.No.61 of 2005, dated 18.12.2009, passed by the learned Principal Special Judge for trial of SPE and ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Aggrieved by the said conviction, the appellants filed the present appeal.
2. Heard Sri C.Sharan Reddy, learned Counsel for the appellants and Sri M.Bala Mohan Reddy, learned Special Public Prosecutor for ACB.
3. Briefly, the case of the prosecution is that P.W.1 is the complainant. According to him, he purchased a r
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
