Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Moushumi Bhattacharya, Gadi Praveen Kumar
M. Rajendra Krishna – Appellant
Versus
St. Vincent Educational Society – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.
1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (‘CMA’) arises out of an order dated 07.07.2025 passed in I.A.No.1921 of 2024 in SOP.No.10 of 2024 by the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally (‘The Trial Court’).
2. The appellant had filed SOP.No.10 of 2024 to declare the purported resignation of the appellant from the respondent No.1- M/s. St. Vincent Educational Society (‘the Society’) as being fabricated and not binding on the appellant, and also to declare the Resolutions dated 23.05.2024 and 30.05.2024 passed by the respondent Nos.2-7 in the 1st and 2nd Special General Body Meetings of the Society dated 23.05.2024 and 30.05.2024 respectively as being illegal, null and void.
3. The appellant filed an IA in the SOP under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking a direction on the respondent Nos.1 – 11 to maintain the status quo ante as prevailing prior to the purported resignation letter of the appellant dated 30.04.2024 which was accepted in the Resolution dated 23.05.2024 passed in the 1st Special General Body Meeting of the Society thereby permitting the appe
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
