Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
G.Sammaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to sports quota reservation. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. understanding of government orders regarding reservation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. qualifications for sports reservation outlined. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. disqualification of candidates based on form requirements. (Para 11 , 12 , 15 , 17 , 19) |
| 5. sustained arguments about the merits of sports policy. (Para 18 , 20 , 22) |
| 6. reference to previous legal principles impacting the decision. (Para 63 , 64 , 65) |
ORDER :
1. All these Writ Petitions are hereby disposed of by this Common Order, as the issue involved in these Writ petitions is identical. These Writ Petitions are filed questioning the Sports Policy of the State of Telangana with regard to interpretation and implementation of 2% Sports quota in all the recruitments to various posts.
2. Heard learned counsel for respective parties:
Sri E. Madhan Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri M. Srinivas, Sri J. Sudheer, Sri Ramesh Challa, Sri P.V. Krishnaiah, Sri Kongara Raj Kumar, Sri Chikkudu Prabhakar, Sri Allika Suresh, Smt. Uma Devi Nama, Sri V. Ravi Chandran, learned counsel for the respective petitioners.
Sri P.S. Rajasekhar, learned Standing Counsel for TGPS
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
