Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
B. Venkatesham (Died) – Appellant
Versus
D. Subash – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership disputes on the basis of succession. (Para 3) |
| 2. court's analysis of mental capacity affecting property transactions. (Para 6 , 7 , 14) |
| 3. arguments revolve around title claims and validity of gift deeds. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. affirmation of trial court's decree on appeal. (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
1. Aggrieved by the decree and judgment in O.S. No. 527 of 1989 on the file of the V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, dated 23.08.1999, the unsuccessful defendants preferred this Appeal.
2. Parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit.
3. Undisputed facts are as follows:
One Mohd. Abdulla was the original owner of the suit plot bearing No. 15 admeasuring 260 Square yards and other plots in Survey No. 7 of Abdullah Layout, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad, under sanctioned layout vide permit No. 259/E/1960-61, dated 12.09.1960. He died on 29.01.1964 leaving behind him vast properties, his mother Sakina Bee, first wife Ameena Bee, one daughter through her by name Razia Begum, second wife Jubeda Begum and three sons and three daughters through her. Sakina Bee through her GPA Holder MA Habib filed OS No. 20 of 1967 on the file of the I
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
