Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
P.Sam Koshy, Narsing Rao Nandikonda
Sri Sai Dhurga Balaji Health and Educational Welfare Society – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
ORDER :
P. SAM KOSHY, J.
Heard Mr. Karan Talwar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the show-cause notice dated 16.04.2024 issued under Section 148 of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (briefly ‘the Act’ hereinafter), the order dated 16.04.2024 issued under Section 148 A(d) of the Act, and also the show-cause notice dated 31.03.2024 issued under Section 148 A(b) of the Act.
3. The primary contention on behalf of the petitioner while assailing the impugned order and the show-cause notices was:
i. That the impugned proceedings initiated is without jurisdiction;
ii. That the impugned proceedings and the order under challenge is otherwise barred by limitation; and
iii. That the impugned order and the show-cause notices issued are in blatant violation of the principles of natural justice and also in violation of Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
4. The facts of the case in nutshell, are that, the petitioner M/s. Sri Sai Dhurga Balaji Healt
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
