SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 955

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J.
Mohd. Ibrahim Ali - Appellant
Vs.
Mohd. Lateefuddin - Respondent
Civil Revision Petition Nos.1017 and 2233 of 2023
Decided On : 23-10-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P Sri Harsha Reddy
For the Respondent: Mohammad Adnan

The High Court's supervisory powers under Article 227 of the Constitution ensure that lower courts act within their jurisdiction and do not commit grievous errors; the landlord-tenant relationship was supported by sufficient evidence.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 227 - Civil Procedure Code - Order XII Rule VIII and Order XV-A - Civil Revision Petitions filed against orders related to production of documents and depositing of rents. (Para 1.1)

(B) The powers of the High Court under Article 227 are supervisory and should be exercised to prevent grave injustice or errors in jurisdiction by lower courts. (Para 9)

Facts of the case:
Two Civil Revision Petitions were filed against dismissals of applications regarding the production of original rental agreements and directives for the deposit of rent arrears, with disputes over document admissibility and rental obligations. (Para 1.1, 2.1, 4.1)

Findings of Court:
The High Court upheld the trial court's decision that the relationship of landlord and tenant was established through evidence and did not find any gravely erroneous jurisdictional exercise by the trial court. (Paras 19)

Issues: Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the defendant's application for document production and whether the order to deposit rent was justifiable. (Paras 8.2, 19)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the trial court acted within its jurisdiction and correctly identified the admissibility of documents and obligations of the tenant. (Para 19)

Result: Civil Revision Petitions dismissed without costs.

Table of Content
1. filing of civil revision petition. (Para 1 , 2)
2. essentiality of document production. (Para 3)
3. arguments against the trial court's order. (Para 5)

ORDER :

B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J.

1.1 CRP.No.1017 of 2023 is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 14.09.2022 passed in I.A.No.889 of 2021 in O.S.No.2227 of 2021 by the learned III Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

1.2 CRP.No.2233 of 2023 is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 14.09.2022 passed in I.A.No.217 of 2021 in O.S.No.2227 of 2021 by the learned III Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

In CRP.No.1017 of 2023:

2.1 Petitioner herein is the petitioner – defendant, respondent herein is the respondent – plaintiff in I.A.No.889 of 2021 in O.S.No.2227 of 2021, which is filed under Order XII Rule VIII read with Section 151 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE to call the respondent - plaintiff to produce the documents i.e.,

1. Xerox Copy Of Rental Agreement executed between Defendant and Plaintiff dated 07.04.2009.

2. Xerox Copy Of Rental Agreement executed between Defendant and Plaintiff dated 05.11.2013.

3. Xerox Copy Of Rental Agreement executed between Defendant and Plaintiff dated 05.10.2014.

4. Xerox Copy Of Rental Agreement executed between Defendant and Plaintiff dated 05.09.2015.

5. Xerox Copy Of Rental Agreement executed between Defendant and Plaintiff dated 05.06.2017.

6. Xerox Copy Of Rental Agreement executed between Defendant and Plaintiff dated 05.05.2018.

In CRP.No.2233 of 2023:

2.2 Petitioner herein is the respondent – defendant, respondent herein is the petitioner – plaintiff in I.A.No.217 of 2021 in O.S.No.2227 of 2021, which is filed under Order XV-A of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE to direct the respondent - defendant to deposit rents in respect of the suit property to the credit of the suit or pay the same directly to the petitioner - plaintiff for the period of April 2020 to June 2021 total amounting to Rs.3,38,000/- and continue to pay the same pending disposal of the suit.

Grounds in CRP.No.1017 of 2023:

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Judge ought to have called for the documents, which are essential to the claim of the petitioner - defendant. On the other hand, the learned Trial Court relied on the documents in I.A.No.217 of 2021 filed by the respondent-plaintiff under Order XV-A of CPC to deposit rents in respect of the suit schedule property relying on unregistered documents. The impugned order is self-contradictory in nature and completely antithetical to the probabilities of the case and prayed to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.889 of 2021 in O.S.No.2227 of 2021, dated 14.09.2022.

Grounds in CRP.No.2233 of 2023:

4.1 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Judge ought to have seen that the original copies of the documents were essential to support the claim of the petitioner - defendant. The learned Trial Judge failed to consider that the respondent herein – plaintiff has admitted in his counter that the documents of rental deeds were unregistered, insufficiently stamped and inadmissible in evidence as they filed the xerox copies, then the Court ought not to have marked the documents and ought not to have granted relief of deposit of arrears of rent.

4.2 The learned Trial Court ought to have seen that Ex.P1 are the counter foils of rental receipts which were marked without production of the original receipts and moreover the respondent herein – petitioner - plaintiff failed to produce the original documents. Ex.P4 is the returned postal cover, which itself is a proof that the petitioner herein - defendant has not received the notice sent by the respondent herein – petitioner - plaintiff. When the petitioner herein - defendant is in occupation over the suit schedule property, the question of return of the registered postal cover with an endorsement that ‘no such person is residing in this house’ do

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top