Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J.SREENIVAS RAO
G.Pradeep – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case are presented (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments from both parties (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's review of complaint details and evidence (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. judicial principles regarding delay and civil context (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. criminal proceedings should not abuse civil disputes (Para 14) |
| 6. punit beriwala case distinct from present facts (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. continuation of proceedings analyzed by court (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 8. final order and decision of the court (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER:
J. SREENIVAS RAO, J.
This Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 seeking to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.44 of 2023 of Jogipet Police Station, Sangareddy District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 350, 390, 388, 420 and 403 read with 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for short, ‘the IPC’).
2. Brief facts of the case:
Respondent No.2/de facto complainant and petitioner No.1/accused No.1 stayed together in Hyderabad from 2007 to 2010 and during their studies/employment, developed close friendship. Later, petitioner No.1 left for the United States. At the r
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
