Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RENUKA YARA
Hyder Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
Chinthakayala Anjaneyulu DIED) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal challenging lower court judgments on land ownership. (Para 2) |
| 2. facts of land ownership and claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's conclusion on joint ownership and injunction denial. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 14) |
| 4. questions on title and injunction rights. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final ruling on the appeal and future remedies. (Para 15 , 19) |
JUDGMENT :
RENUKA YARA, J.
Heard Sri G. Ramakrishna, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri M. Govind Reddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6, on admission. Perused the record.
2. This Second Appeal is preferred challenging the judgment and decree dated 06.06.2024 in A.S.No.50 of 2023 on the file of the Principal District Judge at Mahabubnagar (‘first appellate Court’), confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.08.2023 in O.S.No.62 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Jedcherla (‘trial Court’), wherein the suit files seeking perpetual injunction by the appellant/plaintiff against the respondents/defendants has been dismissed. I.A.No.1 of 2025 in the present appeal is preferred to condone delay of 234 days in filing of the Second Appeal.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant he
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
