Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RENUKA YARA
Varala Mahalaxmi – Appellant
Versus
Muktha Bharathi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of ownership by plaintiffs (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. defendant's claim of ownership and possession (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. grounds of appeal and errors claimed (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. errors in trial court’s findings (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. burden of proof on plaintiffs (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. evidence presented by plaintiffs and defendants (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. conclusion of the appeal and dismissal of the suit (Para 38 , 39) |
JUDGMENT :
RENUKA YARA, J.
1. Heard Sri Kondadi Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants/defendant Nos.1 to 3 and Sri M.R.S. Srinivas, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2/plaintiffs. Perused the record.
2. This is an appeal preferred by the appellants/defendant Nos.1 to 3 aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC), Mancherial, in O.S.No.10 of 2017 (Old O.S.No.23 of 2015 of District Court, Adilabad), dated 27.02.2019, wherein, respondent Nos.1 and 2/plaintiffs are granted the relief of permanent injunction restraining the appellants/defendant Nos.1 to 3 and respondent Nos.3 to 5/defendant Nos.4 to 6 from interfering with the suit schedule properties w
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
