Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.Lakshman
Kurakula Gajendra Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Kurakula Shanta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of property acquisition and allegations of fraud. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments by petitioners against the validity of the order. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. procedural issues raised by petitioners regarding tribunal. (Para 10 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. legal provisions and conditions under section 23 of the act. (Para 15 , 23 , 34) |
| 5. writ petition allowed; previous order set aside. (Para 74) |
ORDER :
K. Lakshman, J.
Heard Sri Manu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Avinash Desai, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri T.P.S. Harsha, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 and, learned Asst.Govt.Pleader for Women and Child Welfare Department appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. This writ petition is filed challenging the order dated17.05.2025 in Case No.D/234/2025 of 2nd respondent. Vide the aforesaid order, 2nd respondent held that properties mentioned in Schedule ‘A’ and ‘B’ of the application filed by 1st respondent are acquired by the 1st respondent by her late husband and she is the absolute owner of the said properties etc., and ordered cancellation of all seven (7) registered gift settlement deeds.
3. 1st respondent, mother of the 1st petitioner, mother-in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
