IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
DVKAV Prasad Rao – Appellant
Versus
Bhuthanadhu Murali Dhora – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the civil revision petition and premise background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding jural relationship of landlord and tenant. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's review of the trial court's decision. (Para 6 , 7 , 13) |
| 4. legal standards for supervisory power under article 227. (Para 8 , 19) |
ORDER :
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order passed in I.A.No.102 of 2023 in O.S.No.1002 of 2022, by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Medchal - Malkajgiri District at Malkagiri, dated 18.08.2023.
2. Petitioner is the plaintiff and respondent is the defendant in the suit. Petitioner has filed I.A.No.102 of 2023 in O.S.No.1002 of 2022 under Order XV(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to direct the respondent - defendant to pay arrears of rent of Rs.55,30,000/- from 01.04.2016 to 30.11.2022 at the rate of Rs.70,000/- per month and future rents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has requested the petitioner that he intended to start business in the name and style of M/s. Green Mint India Agree Tech Private Limited and requested to let out the suit schedule property viz
Raghu Lakshminarayanan vs. Fine Tubes
M.B. Chander and Others vs. Balakrishna Rao Charitable Trust, Hyderabad
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.