Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Narsing Rao Nandikonda
T.PARVATHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
A.P.S.R.T.C. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of appeals against tribunal order (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the motor accident and claims rationale (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. tribunal awarded compensation based on evidence (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. arguments made by both parties regarding compensation (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. assessment of deceased's income and tribunal's error (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. legal principles for calculating compensation (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. finalizing compensation based on legal standards (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. conclusion and order regarding compensation (Para 25 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
Narsing Rao Nandikonda, J.
M.A.C.M.A.No.2881 of 2018 is filed by the Claimants and M.A.C.M.A.No.3450 of 2018 is filed by the RTC Corporation against order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal – cum – Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad (hereinafter will be referred as ‘Tribunal”) in M.V.O.P.No.628 of 2014, order dated 09.04.2018. The claimants before the Tribunal had filed the claim petition under Section 166 of M.V.Act, 1988 seeking compensation of Rs.30,00,000/- on account of death of Sri T.Naresh, (herein after referred as ‘deceased’) who died in Motor Vehicle accident occurred on 02.1
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
