Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G.M.MOHIUDDIN
Abotula Brindaraka – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Sri Nambi Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri R.Nagarjuna Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical and Health for respondent No.1; Sri G.Praveen Kumar, Assistant Government Pleader for Sports for respondent No.2; Sri T.Sharath, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3-University and perused the record.
2. This writ petition is filed by a student and a National Level Fencing player, who has qualified for NEET-UG 2025 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of mandamus (i) to declare the inaction of the Kaloji Narayana University of Health Sciences (for short ‘KNRUHS’) in considering the email representations of the petitioner dated 15.01.2025 and 28.08.2025 as illegal; (ii) to declare the debarment of three years and penalty of Rs.20 lakhs imposed as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional; (iii) to declare the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in NEET 2025 Category-A counselling, and (iv) to extend the benefit of reservation under the Sports Quota as per G.O.Ms.No.114 (HM&FW) Department, dated 05.07.2017, with a carry-forward of the COVID-19 affected years (2020-2021).
Factual Matrix
3. Shorn of unnecess
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
