Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Viswanath Spinnerz India Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition regarding disruptions in business operations due to search and seizure. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claims made regarding legal authority for search proceedings. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's ruling to set aside the unlawful search. (Para 13) |
| 4. conclusion and disposal of the writ petition. (Para 14) |
ORDER :
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.
1. This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
“...declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in issuing Search Proceedings dated 26.08.2025 in File No.C.No.80/Memo/SDPO-M/2025 and also consequential acts of Search and Seizure Panchanama dated 28.08.2025 conducted by Respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary in violation of Section 103 read with Sections 96 and 97 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (b) To quash/set aside the Search Proceedings dated 26.08.2025 in File No.C.No.80/Memo/SDPO-M/2025 issued by the Respondent No.3 as illegal and arbitrary (c) To quash/set aside the Search and Seizure Panchanama dated 28.08.2025 conducted by Respondent No.4 as illegal and arbitrary (d) Consequently direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 not to interfere or cause obstructions in the business activities of the 2nd Pe
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
