Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
SRVS Industries – Appellant
Versus
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s claim based on technical flaws (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's defense on procedural compliance (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. counterarguments on technical support and training (Para 6) |
| 4. clarifications on bidder usability and process integrity (Para 7) |
| 5. legal findings on non-compliance and validity of the tender process. (Para 10) |
| 6. court's finding on compliance and procedural integrity (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. dismissal of the writ petition (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER:
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
M/s SRVS Industries – Appellant
Versus
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No. 18383 OF 2025
Decided On : 23-09-2025
Advocate Appeared :
For the Respondent : M/S INDUS LAW FIRM
This Writ Petition is filed in response to respondents' refusal to consider petitioner's request to conduct e-Reverse Auction (e-RA) process afresh following an alleged technical glitch. The petitioner also seeks to have e-RA process conducted on 24.06.2025 for construction of roads and drains at Kurnool-3 Pooling Station, under Tender Specification No. SR-I/C&M/WC-4078/2025/RFx-5002004275 (SR1/NT/W-
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
