Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V.VENUGOPAL
Amtul Vakil Sidra – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of abortion case. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on legal rights regarding abortion. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on delay and domestic context. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. right to privacy and dignity concerning abortion. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's view on frivolous litigation and quashing f.i.r. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. conclusion on quashing of the legal proceedings. (Para 16) |
ORDER :
E.V. VENUGOPAL, J.
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. seeking to call for the entire records relating to F.I.R.No.693 of 2024 on the file of the learned III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad (for short, “the trial Court”) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 315 of I.P.C. and Section 175 (3) of B.N.S.S. and quash the same.
2. Heard Mr.Mohd. Adnan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.E.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1-State and Mr.Khaja Vizarath Ali, learned counsel for unofficial respondent No.2.
3. The brief facts of the case are that petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2/de facto complainant are wife and husband; th
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
