Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
B.Raju, Hyd – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Electronics Ltd, Bangalore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's promotion claims based on st reservation. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondent's stance on promotion policies and sc/st representation. (Para 2) |
| 3. supreme court decisions on sc/st reservation principle. (Para 3 , 4 , 7) |
| 4. court's analysis on delay and lack of respondents. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. outcome: writ petition dismissed due to lack of merit. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER :
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
Petitioner claims to be belonging to ST community. He was appointed as Deputy Engineer (E-II) in Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) on 23.10.1989 and got promotions as Senior Engineer (E-III) in 1994; as Deputy Manager (E-IV) in 1998 and as Manager (E-V) in 2004. He contends that he was eligible to hold the post of Manager (E-V) in the year 2002 itself, but was not promoted for four times. He also Contends that he was eligible for promotion to the post of Deputy General Manager (E-VI) in July 2008, but was not promoted and he was denied promotion as DGM in 2009, 2010 and 2011, instead some of his juniors were promoted respectively. He subsequently, was promoted as DGM (E-VI) on 29.06.2012.
1.1. It is the case of petitioner that in view of denial of promotion for the years men
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
