Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G.M.MOHIUDDIN
T.Purnachandra chary – Appellant
Versus
Government of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the legality of construction activities (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. affidavits regarding blasting permissions (Para 4) |
| 3. statutory compliance for permissions noted (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. regulatory framework for blasting in hyderabad (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. petition closed due to compliance (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER:
Heard Ms. Ch.Mounika, learned counsel representing Mr. Boda Vinodhar, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.36517 of 2021, Mr. P.Sri Raghuram, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Arvind Geedipelli, learned counsel for respondent No.5 in W.P.No.36517 of 2021, Mr. Mohammed Imran Khan, learned Additional Advocate General appears for respondent Nos.1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 in SUO MOTU W.P(PIL).No.4 of 2024, Mr. Zeeshan Adnan Mahmood, learned Standing Counsel for the Telangana State Pollution Control Board appears for respondent No.11 in W.P.No.36517 of 2021 and respondent No.4 in SUO MOTU W.P(PIL).No.4 of 2024 and Mr. K.Goutham Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Industries and Commerce, Mines and Geology Department appears for respondent Nos.9 and 12 in W.P.No.36517 of 2021.
2. Writ petition was preferred for declaring the action of the respondents particularly r
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
