Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G.M.MOHIUDDIN
Spandana Rural and Urban Development Organisation – Appellant
Versus
Assessment Unit – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging tax demands based on claimed charitable work. (Para 2) |
| 2. misinterpretation of income additions by tax authority. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. requirement for detailed assessment in tax authority's decisions. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 4. disposal of writ petition with directions for review. (Para 12) |
ORDER:
Ms.Akruti Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.Vijhay K.Punna, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department appears for respondents No.1 to 3, virtually.
2. The petitioner – assessee has assailed the order dated 23.08.2025 passed on the stay application by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Hyderabad [for short, ‘the CIT (Exemption)’], in respect of the outstanding amount of Rs.53,74,67,120/- relatable to the assessment year 2023-24.
3. The impugned order reads as under:
“GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
CIT (EXEMPTION), HYD
To, PANDANA RURAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION Plot No.31 and 32, Ramky Selenium Towers Tower-A, Ground Floor, Financial Dist.Manuu S.O. GACHIBOWLI HYDERABAD 500032, Telangana India |
| PAN: AABTS9855J | Assessment Year: 2023-24 | Dated: 23/08/2025 | DIN & Letter No: ITBA/COM/F/17/2025-26/1079923109(1) |
Sir/Madam/M/
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
