SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1109

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J.
 
M/s. Comfort Finacap Limited - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Telangana - Respondent 
Crl.P Nos.7351, 7364, 7423, 7424, 7485, 7486, 7490, 7492, 7510, 7511, 7512, 7516, 7518, 7520, 7552, 7549, 7493 & 7559 of 2018
Decided On : 27-08-2018 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P V A Padmanabham
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor TG

Freezing of bank accounts under Section 102 Cr.P.C is lawful during investigations without prior notice, and challenges to such orders are not maintainable when alternative remedies exist.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 406, 420, 447, 385, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120B r/w 34 - Cr.P.C - Section 102 - Petitioners challenged the freezing of accounts during a criminal investigation. Court held the freezing was legal as it adhered to procedural requirements, despite the petitioners' claims of illegality and lack of prior notice. The court ruled that no prior notice is mandated before freezing under Section 102 Cr.P.C. The investigation into alleged financial misconduct was ongoing, and petitioners were advised to seek remedies under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C post-investigation. (Paras 30, 71, 90)

(B) Quashing of Proceedings - Not maintainable under Section 482 Cr.P.C when alternative remedies exist under the Code. (Paras 41, 89)

(C) Natural Justice - Freezing of accounts without prior notice does not violate principles of natural justice as per established legal precedents. (Paras 74, 76) facts of the case: The petitions involved multiple corporate entities whose accounts were frozen in the course of an ongoing investigation into financial misconduct attributed to a director associated with these companies. The primary complainant alleged misuse of funds and fraudulent activities. (Paras 1-11)

Findings of Court:
The petitions were dismissed, reinforcing that the investigative agency acted within its authority under Section 102 Cr.P.C. The petitioners were advised to approach the appropriate court for relief.

Issues: The court addressed whether the petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C were maintainable given the existence of alternative statutory remedies and the procedural validity of the freezing orders.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the legality of freezing accounts during the investigation, dismissing claims of illegality due to lack of notice, and confirmed that the investigation's integrity must be preserved.

Result: Petitions dismissed with no order as to costs.

ORDER :

M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J.

1) All these petitions are filed by the 3rd parties in Crime No.248 of 2013 pending on the file of Economic Offences Wing (hereinafter referred as EOW),CID, Hyderabad.

2) The petitioners are the companies represented by the authorized signatories Mr.Anil Agrawal and others whose deposits were freezed by the Investigating Agency during investigation in the said Crime No.248 of 2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 406 , 420, 447, 385, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120B r/w 34 of IPC.

3) All the petitions are filed for the relief of quashing the order passed under Section 102 Cr.P.C freezing the bank accounts/demat accounts of the companies and individuals by the Investigating Officer.

4) In all the petitions, the accused and defacto complainant are one and the same, and the relief claimed is also the same. Therefore, I find it expedient to decide all the petitions by common order.

5) The details of the reliefs claimed by different persons are mentioned hereunder in a table:

Sl. No .Crl.P.Nos.PartiesRelief
1.7351 of 2018M/S.Comfort Fincap Ltd Anil Agrawal (Director)To quash and set aside the proceeding dated 27.04.2017 for freezing of the Demat accounts bearing Nos:1205370000016984 and 1205370000039858
2.7364 of 2018M/s. First Financial Services Ltd.To quash and set aside the proceedings dated 27.04.2017 for freezing of the Demat accounts bearing No.1205370000039877 and 1205370000015830
3.7423 of 2018M/s.Comfort Securities Ltd. Anil Agrawal (Director)Quash and set aside the proceedings dated 27.04.2017 by 1st respondent freezing of demat accounts bearing Nos.1205370000002103 , 1205370000039843, 1205370000020061, 1205370000023645 and 1203660000032911
4.7424 of 2018M/s. Comfort Securities Ltd. Anil Agrawal (Director)Quash and set aside the proceedings of 1st respondent dated 04.04.2017 4882/C- 9/EOW/CID/TS/2016 ii.freezing of bank account bearing No.910020039136606
5.7485 of 2018MM/s. Comfort Intech Ltd. Anil Agrawal (Director)Quash and set aside the proceedings dated 27.04.2017 for freezing of demat account viz: Client ID No.10503314
6.7486 of 2018M/s.Comfort Intech Ltd. Anil Agrawal (Director)Quash and set aside the proceedings dated 27.04.2017 for freezing of demat accounts by 1st respondent bearing Nos.1205370000039862 , 1205370000001585 and 1203660000024288
7.7490 of 2018Anil agarwal and Ankur GarwalQuash and set aside the proceedings dated 27.04.2017 for freezing of demat accounts bearing No.1205370000000028, 1205370000000032 and 1205370000005805
8.7492 of 2018M/s. Comfort Intech Ltd.Quash and set aside the order dated 02.02.2015 passed by 1st respondent for freezing of 23,66,000 shares lying in the demat account bearing No.1205370000001585
9.7510 of 2018M/s.First Financial Services Ltd. Anil Agrawal is closely connectedQuash and set aside the order dated 02.02.2015 for freezing of shares lying in demat account bearing No.12053700000158320
107511 of 2018M/s. Syncom Formulations India Ltd Anil Agrawal is share holder by SEBI investigationTo quash and set aside the proceedings dated 02.02.2015, for freezing of 511000 shares of the petitioner lying in demat account bearing No.1205370000015300
11.7512 of 2018M/s.Syncom Formulations India Ltd (Mr.Vijay S.Bankoda) Anil Agrawal Co.Comfort is share holderQuash and set aside the proceedings dated 27.04.2017 for freezing of demat account vide Client ID.No.10503785
127516 of 2018M/s. Comfort Securities Ltd. Anil Agrawal (Director)Quash and set aside the proceedings dated 27.04.2017 issued by 1st respondent for freezing of demat account vide client ID:10503306
137518 of 2018M/s.Comfort Intech Limited Anil Agrawal (Director)Quash and set aside the proceedings dated 27.04.2017 and freezing of demat accounts viz: client ID No.10503363
14.7520 of 2018M/s.Comfort Intech Limited Anil Agrawal (Director)To quash and set aside the proceedings vide 4882/C-9/EOW/ CID/TS/2016 dated 04.04.2017 in freezing of bank accounts bearing No.318001010036897, 318001010036374 and 318001010036373

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top