Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN
Cherabuddi Kartikeya – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial court orders on property dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's ownership claim details (Para 4) |
| 3. respondent no.5's defense and counterclaims (Para 5) |
| 4. court's analysis of pending civil cases (Para 6) |
| 5. conclusion on writ petition dismissal (Para 7) |
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. P. Bhanu Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Mr. Dara Sreesailam, learned counsel for respondent No.5.
2. Initially, vide 22.07.2024, this Court disposed of the aforesaid writ petition by dispensing with the notice to unofficial respondent No.5 herein, directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 04.07.2024 submitted by the petitioner seeking 3 restoration of his name in the revenue records in respect of the subject property by deleting the name of respondent No.5 and issue e-Pattedar passbook and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, by putting the General Power of Attorney, i.e. the father of the petitioner, respondent No.5 and all affected parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. If, respondent No.2 is not inclined to accept
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
