Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Hyderabad Connectronics Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition challenges labour court order. (Para 1) |
| 2. claims of lay-off compensation and settlements. (Para 2) |
| 3. procedural irregularities and responsibility of the labour court. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. arguments regarding violation of natural justice examined. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. entitlement to wages and lay-off procedures. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. withdrawal of amounts by employees addressed. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. lack of evidence for claims and settlements by employees. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 8. final judgment and dismissal of writ petition. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER :
1. Questioning the Order passed by Respondent No. 2 Labour Court-II in M.P. No. 51 of 2004, dated 18-01-2019, whereby Petitioner Company-M/s Hyderabad Connectronics Limited was directed to pay Rs. 1,58,12,319/- to Respondents No. 3 to 66, without granting an opportunity of being heard to Petitioner after reopening the case suo motu and without considering the fact that full and final settlement had already been made with some of the Respondents and without ensuring proper service of notice to Petitioner, this Writ Petition is instituted.
2. The grievance of petitioner is that impugned order violates the principles of natural justice. The L
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
