IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
NARENDER SINGH THAKUR DIED – Appellant
Versus
Usha Rani Thakur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property ownership and initial family disputes (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. legal issues framed for trial (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. arguments presented by parties (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court's analysis of the will and inheritance (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. conclusion and upholding the trial court's judgment (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT :
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J.
This is an appeal filed by the appellants, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 06.12.2018 passed in O.S.No.561 of 2009 by the learned IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (for short “the trial Court”).
2. The appellants herein are the defendant Nos.4, 5 and 8 to 11, respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and respondent Nos.2 to 6 are the defendant Nos.1 to 3, 6 and 7 before the trial Court. The parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed in the suit before the trial Court for the sake of convenience and clarity.
3. The facts of the case before the trial Court are that the plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 to 3 and 6 are the daughters, defendant Nos.4 and 5 are the sons and defendant No.7 is the wife of one late Karan Singh Thakur and that during his life time Karan Singh Thakur has purchased the suit
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.