Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
GALI RAMADEVI AND 3 ORS. – Appellant
Versus
ETTAVENI BHADRAIAH AND 2 ORS. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J.
This M.A.C.M.A. is filed by the appellants/claimants/petitioners under Section 173 of M.V.Act against the Award and decree passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VII Additional District Judge, Karimnagar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) in O.P.No.168 of 2004, dated 08.06.2004, seeking compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- on account of the death of Gali Rajaiah (hereinafter referred to as “deceased”) in an accident that occurred on 19.10.2003.
2. For convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed before the Tribunal.
3. The brief facts of the case are that appellants/claimants earlier filed O.P.No.168 of 2004 under Section 166 (1) (c) of the M.V.Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of the deceased, who died in the accident alleged to have caused due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the Tractor. It is contended that on 19.10.2003, the deceased went to Mankammathota when he reached old employment office, a Tractor & Trailor bearing No.AP-15-V-5935/5936, came in rash and negligent manner with high speed being driven by its driver lost control over it and dashed deceased sc
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
